Fourth retraction for Haruko Obokata, focus of STAP cell scandal, after Harvard investigation – Retraction Watch
More than 5 years after Nature retracted two extremely suspect papers about what had been described as a serious breakthrough in stem cell analysis, one other journal has pulled a paper concerning the work.
The scandal over so-called STAP stem cells took down greater than only a few articles. The case centered on Haruko Obokata, a Japanese researcher who performed the research as a post-doc within the Harvard lab of Charles Vacanti. Obokata misplaced her doctoral thesis from Waseda University in 2015 as a result of it plagiarized from the U.S. National Institutes of Health. She additionally retracted a paper in Nature Protocols.
Vacanti, who had been one of essentially the most distinguished figures in regenerative medication, ended up leaving Harvard, the place he had been the chair of the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine. He seems to have dropped out of science completely.
Tragically, one of Obokata’s co-authors and a former mentor, Yoshiki Sasai, dedicated suicide consequently of the revelations concerning the findings emerged.
Dr. Charles A. Vacanti, the senior writer of the article entitled, “The Potential of Stem Cells in Adult Tissues Representative of the Three Germ Layers,” (vol. 17, nos. 5/6, pages 607–615), revealed within the March 2011 situation of Tissue Engineering: Part A contacted the Journal to request a proper retraction of the article following an investigation by a Harvard Medical School Committee on Scientific Integrity evaluating a broadcast erratum of the unique work offered.
The reader is directed to the revealed correction discover to the article in 2014.1 While the authors maintained that the revealed erratum was correct, the committee couldn’t validate the accuracy of the corrections. Consequently, the authors agreed to request a proper retraction.
Tissue Engineering, its editors, and its writer are dedicated to upholding the strictest requirements of the scientific report and the neighborhood it serves.
The paper has been cited 17 occasions, in accordance with Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science.
Sophie Reisz, the vice chairman and govt editor of Mary Ann Liebert, which publishes the journal, instructed us:
We have been contacted by Dr. Vacanti requesting a retraction on December 13, 2019, and we agreed to retract the article instantly primarily based on the data offered by Dr. Vacanti. There was no concern that we recall concerning the specific article expressed by Dr. Vacanti, or anybody else prior to now, following the publication of the erratum that required any motion by the journal.
As the discover implies, Harvard has accomplished its investigation of the case. We requested the college when it accomplished the inquiry and for a abstract of the findings. Their response was, sadly, nonresponsive:
We are absolutely dedicated to upholding the best requirements of ethics and to scrupulously sustaining the integrity of our analysis. Any issues delivered to our consideration are totally reviewed in accordance with institutional insurance policies and relevant laws.
Like Retraction Watch? You could make a tax-deductible contribution to help our work, comply with us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, or subscribe to our day by day digest. If you discover a retraction that’s not in our database, you may tell us right here. For feedback or suggestions, e-mail us at firstname.lastname@example.org.