Partnering to streamline review | PLOS Blogs Network
I’m completely happy to announce PLOS’ participation in a brand new service, Review Commons, that can present a platform for fast, goal, journal-independent peer opinions for manuscripts and preprints. We are excited to be a part of this initiative and to study from our neighborhood’s response how we will rethink peer review to save authors’, reviewers’, and editors’ time and improve transparency and objectiveness.
Created by ASAPbio and EMBO Press, Review Commons will set up a single spherical of journal-agnostic review for manuscripts within the life sciences submitted to the service. Upon receiving the opinions, the authors can resolve to merely submit them alongside their preprint on bioRxiv and/or to submit their manuscript — together with opinions–to one of many 17 journals affiliated with Review Commons. If the chosen journal decides to proceed with the submission, it commits to not contain new reviewers except a selected side of the article wants to be additional evaluated.
All the PLOS journals inside scope — PLOS Biology, PLOS Computational Biology, PLOS Genetics, PLOS ONE and PLOS Pathogens — will welcome submissions reviewed at Review Commons.
Saving researchers’ time and rising transparency
Journal-independent moveable review has the potential to speed up and streamline the method of publishing. Authors can use their peer opinions to inform their journal choice and discover the perfect match for his or her work from the beginning. Because the opinions carry over to any affiliate journal, it’ll additionally scale back re-reviewing at a number of journals that at present imposes a big burden of duplicated actions throughout the scientific neighborhood (estimated at thousands and thousands of hours of reviewer time every year).
But we additionally hope to find out about how authors, reviewers and editors strategy peer review performed exterior of a selected journal context. It shouldn’t be the primary time that journal-agnostic peer review has been tried, however on this case the affiliation with preprints supplies a a lot better alternative for transparency of the complete peer review course of, and offers authors extra management over how they share and contextualize their work.
The peer opinions offered by Review Commons will be posted on bioRxiv utilizing the brand new performance that the preprint server is unveiling at this time — TRiP (Transparent Review in Preprints) an annotation layer powered by hypothes.is devoted to submit opinions by a journal or peer-review service.
Your suggestions is essential
We are actually keen to learn the way journal-independent moveable peer review adjustments the submission expertise, and the way peer opinions posted in real-time can enrich the preprints on bioRxiv and assist authors refine their work. We’ll be monitoring the efficacy of the service in order that we will share again the outcomes and inform broader enhancements to peer review.
We encourage you to discover the TRiP performance on bioRxiv and to keep tuned for the opening of Review Commons in December!
Source: Partnering to streamline review